Influence of Promotional Tools and Physicians’ Demographics A Study in Indian Pharmaceutical Industry

Vinita Srivastava

Abstract


This paper attempts to study the association between physicians’ demographics and promotional tools influence on prescription behaviour. This paper is part of a larger study. Primary data for the study from physicians was collected through a survey using a structured questionnaire. One thousand physicians were identified through systematic random sampling. The questionnaire was administered face to face through personal visits in physicians’ chambers in the hospitals. A significant association is found between practicing years and educational programs, medical representative and samples influence on prescription behaviour. Qualification of respondents’ was found to be related with medical representative’s influence on prescription behaviour. Physicians with the qualification of Master of Surgery have the highest mean influence on prescription behaviour. A significant association was found between specialty of physicians’ and mean influence score of medical representative, gifts and samples. Orthopaedics specialty scored highest  for the mean influence score of medical representative. Numbers of prescriptions were found to be associated with educational programs influence on prescription behaviour. Physicians writing 21 to 50 prescriptions in a week were found to be most influenced by educational programs. 


Keywords


Pharmaceutical industry, Promotional tools, Physician demographics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carter, Franklin J., Carol Motley, Alphonso Ogbuehi, and Jacqueline A. Williams (2006), “An Application of a Repeat-Purchase Diffusion Model to the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Advances in Business and Management Forecasting, 4 (February), 145–174.

Gonul, Fusun F., Carter, Franklin, Petrova, Elina and Srinivasan, Kannan, “Promotion of Prescription Drugs and Its Impact on Physicians’ Choice Behavior”, Journal of Marketing. Jul2001, Vol. 65 Issue 3, p79-90. 12p. 3 Charts.

Handa Meenakshi, Vohra Anupama and Srivastava Vinita, “Perceptions of physicians towards pharmaceutical promotion in India”, Journal of Medical Marketing, May 2013.

Howie, Patrick and Kleczyk, Ewa J., “The impact of promotion on the development and stabilization of pharmaceutical product perceptions”, Journal of Medical Marketing. Feb2011, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p32-37. 6p.

http://www.ibef.org/industry/pharmaceutical-india. aspx, accessed on 18/6/2015

http://indiapharmasummit.in, “Indian Pharma Summit 2014-15”,Policy landscape Reforms for Strengthening Indian Pharmaceutical industry, accessed on 18/6/2015

http://zeenews.india.com/news/health/health-news/

doctor-patient-ratio-in-india-less-than-who-prescribedlimit_1551946.html, accessed on 18/6/2015

http://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/publications/2013/ changing-landscape-of-the-indian-pharma-industry. pdf, accessed on 18/06/2015

http://www.imshealth.com/deployedfiles/imshealth/ Global/Content/Corporate/Press%20Room/Top_ line_data/Promo_Spend_By_Type.pdf, accessed on 18/6/2015

Manchanda, P., & Honka, E. (2005). The effects and role of direct-to-physician marketing in the pharmaceutical industry: An integrative review. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics, 5(2), 785–822

Narayanan, Sridhar, Puneet Manchanda, and Pradeep K. Chintagunta. (2005). “Temporal Differences in the Role of Marketing Communication in New Products Categories,” Journal of Marketing Research 42(August), 278–290

Pedan, Alex and Wu, Hongsheng , “Asymmetric Responsiveness of Physician Prescription Behavior to Drug Promotion of Competitive Brands Within an Established Therapeutic Drug Class”, Health Marketing Quarterly. Apr-Jun2011, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p133-154. 22p. 7 Charts, 2 Graphs.

Soneji Haresh and Banerjee Aawam, “Indian Pharma Majors Prefer Brand Promotion Over R & D”, Economic Times, Dec 15, 2004.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.