A Thematic Journey from Organizational Excellence to Business Sustainability

Jayashree S Sadri, Shweta Mishra, Keshav Nath


This article is an offshoot of the work undertaken in the Western Indian region since 2001, by Sadri and Jayashree and in a manner of speaking, a culmination of a study into the logical flow of organizational imperatives. Following up from the work of Jayashree (2003) the authors began with the supposition that managerial ethics is the sine qua non for every corporate entity in today’s world. This world is marked by change that is non-linear and non-Newtonian at the same time. It is marked by the concurrent collapse of structures and functions where the paradigm of a matrix organizational structure is a reality. The authors argued that as market competition intensifies capital will increasingly be centralized and concentrated. New forms of oligopolies and oligopsonies will emerge making the business environment at once complicated and competitive. In such an environment only those organizations will survive that are firmly rooted in managerial ethics. This gives it a kind of legitimacy which brings along with it acceptability and perpetuation.

Full Text:



Baron D. Private politics, corporate social responsibility and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 2001; 10.

Boatright JR. Ethics and the Conduct of Business. 3rd Edn. Prentice Hall, Upper, Saddle River, N.J., 1999.

Bowen HR. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper and Row, New York, 1953.

Baranco M, Rodrigues L. Positioning the stakeholder theory within the context of Corporate Social Responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organisational Studies 2007; 12(1).

Carroll AB. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Towards the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons 1991; 34(4).

Carroll AB. Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of Definitional Construct. Business and Society 1999; 38(3).

Dawkins J, Lewis S. CSR in Stakeholder Expectations: And Their Implication for Company Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics 2003; 44.

Donaldson T, Preston LE. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 1995; 20(1).

Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Oxford: Capstone, 1999.

Garriga E, Melé D. Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics 2004; 53(1/2).

Graafland JJ. Collusion, Reputation Damage and Interest in Code of Conduct: The Case of a Dutch Construction Company. Business Ethics: A European Review 2004; 13.

Graafland JJ, van de Ven B. Strategic and Moral Motivation for Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Corporate Governance 2006; 22.

Harrison JS, Freeman RE. Stakeholders, Social Responsibility and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 1999; 42(5).

Heredia R. The Amul India Story. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, 1997.

Jayashree S, Sadri S, Dastoor DS. The Theory and Practice of Managerial Ethics. Jaico Publishing Co., Delhi, 2008.

Jayashree S, Sadri S, Nayak N. A Strategic Approach to Human Resources Management. Jaico Publishing Co., Delhi, 2009.

Jayashree S, Malekar S. Corporate Social Responsibility; a synthesis of micro and macro level interventions. IMED Journal of Management and Social Research Jan 2010; 3(1).

Jayashree S, Sadri S. The Triple Bottom Line. Expert Paper presented at the National Seminar on CSR at Maharaja Sayajirao University Vadodra, Feb 24-25, 2011.

Jones TM, Wicks AC. Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review 1999; 24(2).

Jones TM. Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review 1980; 20(2).

Karanjia BK. Godrej: A 100 years (1897-1997). Two volumes. Viking Penguin Books, New Delhi, 1997.

Lala RM. Beyond the Last Blue Mountain. Viking Penguin Books, New Delhi, 1992.

McWilliams A, Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 2001; 26.

Mohanty RP. Shifting Paradigms in Corporate Social Responsibility. IMED Journal of Management and Social Research Jan 2010; 3(1).

Porter ME, Kramer MR. The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review 2002; 80(12).

Quester P, Thompson B. Advertising and Promotion Leverage on Arts Sponsorship Effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research 2001; 41(1).

Robertson DC, Nicholson N. Expressions of Corporate Social Responsibilities in U.K. firms. Journal of Business Ethics 1996; 15.

Russo MV, Fouts PA. A Resource Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal 1997; 40.

Sadri S, Jayashree S, Ajgaonkar M. Geometry of HR. Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai, 2002.

Sadri S. Corporate Social Responsibility: building local infrastructure. IMED Journal of Management and Social Research Jan 2010; 3(1).

Sadri S, Jayashree S. Business Ethics and Corporate Governance: towards organisational excellence. Current Publications, Agra, 2011.

Sadri S, Guha BS, Jayashree S et al. Manifestations of Excellence in Management. Current Publications, Agra, 2011.

Singer AW. Can a Company Be Too ethical? In: Richardson JE. (Ed). Business Ethics. Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, Guilford CT, 2000.

Singhal R. CSR as Business Strategy. Economic Times, May 15, 2007, Mumbai.

Smith A. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York, Kell, 1966.

Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London, Everyman, 1971.

Waddock S, Graves S. The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal 1997; 18.

Windsor D. The future of Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organisational Analysis 2001; 9(3).

Windsor D. Corporate Social Responsibility: Three Key Approaches. Journal of Management Studies Jan 2001; 43(1).

Wood DJ. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review 1991; 16(4).


  • There are currently no refbacks.