Workplace Humour Styles and Subordinate Work Attitudes of Telecommunication Companies

Ukpong Uwem Johnson, Okparaji, Philip Wuwu Gomba, Obadina Omolola Madubuogu

Abstract


We in this study, sought to examine the empirical link between workers humour style and subordinate work attitudes in Telecommunications Companies Port Harcourt. The population of the study consists of 137 Employees in five telecommunication companies the study adopted the cross-sectional survey design for analysis of the data. Empirical findings reveal that there is a positive significant relationship between workers humour style and subordinate work attitudes. We recommended that, in order for management to effectively partner with their subordinates, it was imperative however that they allowed for and encouraged the practice of positive humour within the organization and that the structure of the organization should be flexible enough to allow for ease of communication and relaxed interactions between managers and their subordinate

Keywords


Workplace Humour Style, Subordinate Work Attitudes, Telecommunications

Full Text:

PDF

References


AghajaniHashjeen T, Shoghi B, Shafizadeh R et al. The Relationship Between Organizational Structure and Employee Creativity. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science 2013; 7(2): 237-242.

Agho AO, Price JL. Discriminant validity of measures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology 1992; 65(4): 185-197.

Atwater L, Carmeli A. Leader-member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly 2007; 20(3): 264-275.

Avolio BJ, Bass BM, Jung DI. Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionn aire. J Occup Org Psychol 1999; 72: 441–462.

Avolio BJ, Howell JM, Sosik JJ. A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Academy of Management Journal 1999; 42(2): 219 –227.

Bagherian R, Bahaman AS, Asnarulkhadi AS et al.Social exchange approach to people’s participations in watershed management programs in Iran. European Journal of Scientific Research 2009; 34(3): 428-411.

Brown SP. A meta-analysis and review of organisational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin 1996; 120(2): 235-255.

Bryman A, Bell E. Business Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2003.

Carbelo B, Jáuregui E. Emocionespositivas: humorpo sitivo. PapelesdelPsicólogo 2006; 27(1): 18-30.

Clouse RW, Spurgeon KL. Corporate analysis of humor. Psychology: Quart J Hum Behaviour 1995; 32(3&4): 1–24.

Kasrai AR, Alirahimi MM. The investigation of relation ship between organizational structure and effectiveness in retirement organization. Journal of Basirat 2009; 44.

Keller RT. Job involvement and organisational commit ment as longitudinal predictors of job performance: A study of scientists and engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997; 82(4): 539-545.

Kelly WE. An investigation of worry and sense of humor. J Psychol 2002; 136: 657-666.

Knoop R. Job involvement: An elusive concept. Psych ological Reports 1986; 59: 451-456.

Lease SH. Work attitudes and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior 1998; 53: 154-183.

Ledbetter R. Organizational structure: Influencing factor and impact in the Grand Prairie Fire Department, National Fire Academy, Grand Prairie, Texas. 2003.

Lefcourt HM, Davidson K, Shepherd R et al. Perspective taking humor: Accounting for stress moderation. J Soc Clin Psychol 1995; 14: 373–391.

Lewis TM. Organizational structure effect on communi cation efficiency for management information system supported organizations: A Delphi Study, Pro Quest Dissertation and Theses 2011.

Liden RC, Sparrowe RT, Wayne SJ. Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 1997; 15: 47–119.

Liu J, Kwan K, Wu L et al. Abusive supervision and subordinate supervisor-directed deviance: The mode rating role of traditional values and the mediating role of revenge cognitions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 2010; 83(4): 835-856.

Martin RA. Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychol Bull 2001; 127: 504–519.

Mayfield J, Mayfield M.Increasing worker outcomes by improving leader follower relations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 1998; 5(1): 72-81

Meyer JC. Humor in member narratives: Uniting and dividing at work. W J Com 1997; 61: 188–208.

Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Smith CA. Commitment to organiz ations and occupations: Extension and test of a threecomponent conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993; 78: 538–551.

Michela J. Understanding employee’s reactions to supervisor’s influence behaviours: A community sample predicting employee commitment, turnover and stress. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 2007; 15(4): 322-340.

Miles RE, Snow CC, Meyer AD et al. Organizational Strat egy, Structure, and Process. Academy of Management Review 1978; 3(3): 546-562.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.