Organizations and Society: A Critique of CSR Initiatives in India

Sharukh N Tara

Abstract


Corporate social responsibility research has so far focused on big businesses. The Supreme Court of India (TOI 13.09.2013) has declared that giving employee benefits does not amount to CSR. Yet, research findings involving large organizations are not wholly transferable to small ones, mainly because SMEs operate under conditions that are different from large ones. This research is intended to address this imbalance.

This article seeks to identify and analyze the philosophy behind Maharashtra based small and medium enterprises engagement in socially responsible activities and to identify the benefits observed and perceived by the SMEs engaged in socially responsible practices. It also helps us to investigate how socially responsible activities lead to sustainable development. Using structured questions, face-to-face interviews are conducted with the owner managers of small and medium sized enterprises in Maharashtra.

The most important aspect this study reveals is whether these small businesses are voluntarily doing socially responsible activities or they are engaged in philanthropy to be popular and just avoid mishaps. It raises the question whether enterprises are engaged in socially responsible activities as a matter of legal compliance, as a part of social obligation or as a part of their business strategy.


Keywords


Corporate social responsibility, Sustainable development, Small and medium sized enterprises, Maharashtra

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bauman Z. Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.

Centre for Social Markets (CSM). Giving Something Back. Social Responsibility and

South Asian Business in the United Kingdom: An Exploratory Study. 2003. Available from: http://www.csmworld.org. Accessed on: Jan 01, 2004.

Cooper DR, Schindler PS. Business Research Methods. 7th Ed. Boston: Mcgraw-Hill, 2001.

Dilts JC, Prough GE. Strategic options for environmental management: a comparative study of small vs. large enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management 1989; 27(3): 31-38.

Liff S, Turner S. Working in a corner shop: are employee relations changing in response to competitive pressures? Employee Relations 1999; 21(4): 418-29.

Longenecker JG, McKinney JA, Moore CW. Ethical Attitude Issues and Pressures in Small Business. 1995. Available from: http// www.sbaer.uca.edu/Research/1995/ICSB/95ics233.txt. Accessed on: Oct 28, 2003.

Longenecker JG, Moore CW, Petty JW. Small Business Management: An Entrepreneurial Emphasis. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing, 1997.

Quinn JJ. Personal Ethics and Business Ethics: The Ethical Attitudes of Owner/Managers of Small Business. Journal of Business Ethics 1997; 16: 119-27.

Sadri S, Makkar U. Future Dimensions in Business. Bharati Publications, Delhi, 2012.

Smith HL, Thompson JK. Social Responsibility and Small Business: Suggestions for Research. Journal of Small Business Management 1991; 29(1): 30-44.

Spence LJ. Does size matter? The state of the art in small business ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review Jul 1999; 8(3): 163-74.

Thompson JK, Smith HL. Social Responsibility and Small Business: Suggestions for Research. Journal of Small Business Management Jan 1991; 29(1): 30-44.

UNIDO (United Nations International Development Organisation). Corporate Social Responsibility and Developing Country SMMEs. 2002. Available from: http:// www.unido.org/doc/330817.htmls. Accessed on: Sep 7, 2002.

Vyakarnam S, Bailey A, Myers A et al. Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behavior in Small Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 1997; 16: 1625-636.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.