Efficiency Assessment and Corporate Sustainability of Banks in Port Harcourt

Ukpong Uwem Johnson, Simon Emmanuel Hart, Chinyere Emeka Maduabuchi, Dagogo Eli Legg-Jack


This study sought to examine the relationship between Efficiency assessment and corporate sustainability of banks in Port Harcourt.
The population for the study was a total of 146 senior management and supervisors of 10 selected banks in Port Harcourt. The sample size of 103 respondents was finally used for data analysis. Based on the findings. We recommended that, the design and growth of efficiency assessment systems should be transparent and follow formats which clearly identify what is expected from the worker and how deviations from expectations are to be managed or corrected Performance measurement should emphasize on outcomes and goals of objectives of the organization. Such specifications should guide what is expected of the workers and the extent to which their performance matches with the requirement. And that consideration should also be given to other performance assessment measures such as relationship with others (interpersonal) as it is evident that support and relational leveraging is critical to the performance of the workers and in the actualization of corporate sustainability.


Efficiency Assessment, Corporate Sustainability, Deposit Money Banks

Full Text:



Bititci US, Carrie AS, McDewitt L. Integrated performance measurement systems: A development guide. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 1997; 17(5): 522– 534.

Copper RD, Schindler SP. Business research Methods. New took: McGraw Hill 2001.

Finkelstein S, Whitehead J, Cambell A. Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions and How to Keep it from Happpening to You. Harvard Business Review Press 2009.

Davis S, Albright T. An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research 2004; 15(2): 135–153.

Doane D, Gillivray MA. Economic Sustainability the business of staying in business, New Economics Foundation, London 2001.

Dyllick T, Hockerts K. Beyond the case for corporate sustainability. Bus Strat Environ 2002; 11(2): 130-141.

Fahy M, Roche J, Weiner et al. Beyond corporate governance: creating corporate value through performance, conformance and responsibility 2004.

Frigo ML, Krumwiede KR. The balanced scorecard. Strategic Finance 2015; 81(7): 50-54.

Fubar N, Mguni C. Research Methods in Behavioral Science. London: Minerva press 1995.

Gond J, Grubnic S, Herzig C et al. Configuring management control systems. Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Manage Account Res 2012; 23:205–223.

Gray R. Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Account Org Soc 2010; 35(1):47–62.

Hahn T, Scheermesser M. Approaches to corporate sustainability among german companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 2006; 13(2): 150-165.

Hawken P, Lovins A, Lovins L H. Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. Little, Brown, Boston, MA 1999.

Van M, Praag VM, CoolsnK. The effects of performance measurement and compensation on motivation: an empirical study 2005; 153: 303-329.

Hopwood AG. Accounting and the environment. Account Org Soc 2009; 34(3-4): 433-439.

Johnson. Hope and operational sustainability of oil companies in Port Harcourt. West African Journal of Business 2017; 12(1): 133-146.

James GM, Roberts IS. Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable. Organization Science 1997; 8(6): 698-706.

Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The strategy-focused organization. how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston 2001.

Latham GP, Budworth M. The study of work motivation in the 20th century. In Historical perspectives in industrial and organizational psychology New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Koppes LL. (Ed) 2007: 353-382..

Latham GP, Locke EA. Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991 50(2), 212- 247.

Leme CFO. Valor gerado pela sustentabilidade corporativa. In: Sustentabilidade e geração de valor: a transição para o século XXI, Lins L, Zylbersztajn D (eds.). Elsevier: Rio de Janeiro 2010; 15(4).

Martinez V, Kennerley M. Impact of performance management reviews: evidence from an energy supplier. In Proceedings of EUROMA 2006; 19-22 June, Budapest.

Mauboussin MJ. Harnessing the Power of Counterintuition, Harvard Business Review Press 2008.

Melvin, Jones. Restructuring for organisational efficiency in Nigeria, Journal of advanced research in management 2008; 11(4): 34-47.

Merchant, Stede VD. Management Control Systems- Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh 2007.

Mouritsen J, Thrane S. Accounting network complementarities and the development of inter-organisational relations 2006; 31: 241-275.

Munck L, Souza RB. Responsabilidade social empresarial, sustentabilidade organizacional le desenvolvimento sustentável: a proposição de umahierarquizaçãoconceitual. Revista Brasileira de Estratégia-REBRAE 2009; 2: 12-29.

Ogolo MB. Student guide to writing project, proposal and research. Port Harcourt: City Creek Publisher 1996.

Ogwo E, Ezejegue C. Basic principle in managing research project. Onitsha, African-Feb publishers Ltd 1990.

Savitz AW, Weber K. The triple bottom line: how today’s best-run companies are achieving. John Wiley & Sons Inc.: San Francisco 2006. 31. Ukko J, Tenhunen J, Rantanen H. Performance measurement impacts on management and leadership: perspectives of management and employee. International Journal of Production Economics 2007; 110: (1-2) 29-51.

Van MM, Werre M. Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 2003; 44: 107-119.


  • There are currently no refbacks.